Skip to main content
Head-to-Head NPM Comparison

threevs@react-three/fiber

Detailed package comparison for bundle size, weekly downloads, supply chain security, and license obligations.

Weekly Downloads Leader
three14.1M/wk
Security Grade Leader
Equal Rating100/100
TypeScript Ready
@react-three/fiber
Specification
threev0.186.1
@react-three/fiberv9.8.2
Weekly Downloads14.1MWinner4.0M
Unpacked Size19.50 MB2.29 MB
Security Grade
A+(100/100)
A+(100/100)
Lifecycle Scripts Clean (No scripts) Clean (No scripts)
TypeScript SupportCommunity @types Built-in Types (.d.ts)
License TypeMITPERMISSIVEMITPERMISSIVE
Direct Dependencies010
Active Maintainers28
Last ReleaseSep 24, 2026Oct 14, 2026
Install Commandnpm i threenpm i @react-three/fiber
Full Security ReportView three AuditView @react-three/fiber Audit
Free Castov VS Code Tool

Compare Dependencies Directly in VS Code

Audit supply chain risks, compare lightweight alternative packages, and catch malicious install scripts straight inside your package.json editor.

Download VS Code Extension

Frequently Asked Questions

Which package is more popular, three or @react-three/fiber?
three is currently more popular with higher weekly downloads (14.1M/week) compared to @react-three/fiber (4.0M/week).
Which has better supply chain security, three or @react-three/fiber?
three has a security score of 100/100 (Grade A+), while @react-three/fiber holds 100/100 (Grade A+). Both packages have equal security standings.
Do three and @react-three/fiber provide TypeScript definitions?
three may require external @types definitions, while @react-three/fiber includes native TypeScript definitions.
What licenses do three and @react-three/fiber use?
three is published under the MIT license (PERMISSIVE), and @react-three/fiber is licensed under MIT (PERMISSIVE).