Skip to main content
Castov
Head-to-Head NPM Comparison

mobxvszustand

Detailed package comparison for bundle size, weekly downloads, supply chain security, and license obligations.

Weekly Downloads Leader
zustand37.7M/wk
Security Grade Leader
Equal Rating100/100
TypeScript Ready
Both Native
Specification
mobxv7.1.0
zustandv5.0.16
Weekly Downloads2.0M37.7MWinner
Unpacked Size4.66 MB93.7 KB
Security Grade
A+(100/100)
A+(100/100)
Lifecycle Scripts Clean (No scripts) Clean (No scripts)
TypeScript Support Built-in Types (.d.ts) Built-in Types (.d.ts)
License TypeMITPERMISSIVEMITPERMISSIVE
Direct Dependencies00
Active Maintainers63
Last ReleaseOct 20, 2026Oct 22, 2026
Install Commandnpm i mobxnpm i zustand
Full Security ReportView mobx AuditView zustand Audit
Free Castov VS Code Tool

Compare Dependencies Directly in VS Code

Audit supply chain risks, compare lightweight alternative packages, and catch malicious install scripts straight inside your package.json editor.

Download VS Code Extension

More Popular Package Comparisons

zustand vs redux@reduxjs/toolkit vs zustandzustand vs jotaizustand vs recoilvaltio vs zustand

Frequently Asked Questions

Which package is more popular, mobx or zustand?
zustand is currently more popular with higher weekly downloads (37.7M/week) compared to mobx (2.0M/week).
Which has better supply chain security, mobx or zustand?
mobx has a security score of 100/100 (Grade A+), while zustand holds 100/100 (Grade A+). Both packages have equal security standings.
Do mobx and zustand provide TypeScript definitions?
mobx includes built-in TypeScript types, while zustand includes native TypeScript definitions.
What licenses do mobx and zustand use?
mobx is published under the MIT license (PERMISSIVE), and zustand is licensed under MIT (PERMISSIVE).